Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law
Articles

War, Trade, and Mercantilism: Reconciling Adam Smith's Three Theories of the British Empire

PDF HTML
  • Barry R. Weingast
Barry R. Weingast
Stanford University
JGTEL

Published 2025-12-31

Keywords

  • Adam Smith,
  • Political Economics,
  • Empire,
  • War and Military Competition,
  • Great Britain vs France, Wars,
  • 1689-1715
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

War, Trade, and Mercantilism: Reconciling Adam Smith’s Three Theories of the British Empire. (2025). Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law, 3(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.70150/97710e06

Abstract

Adam Smith proposed two contradictory theories of the British Empire in the Wealth of Nations and suggested a third. The first view holds that the empire was created for merchants eager to establish and maintain monopolies of the colonial trade. Smith concludes that “Great Britain derives nothing but loss” from the colonies. In the second view, Smith celebrates the European discovery of the new world, opening non-incremental increases in division of labour, specialization and exchange. The empire thus fostered the economic growth of both sides of the British Atlantic, net of the costs of monopoly. Smith’s third argument holds that many mercantile restrictions improved Britain’s security given its long-term military competition with France. How do we reconcile the incompatibility of Smith’s three views of the British Empire? Smith provides no guidance. I argue that, to understand the British Empire, we must view it from the perspective of a long-term military rivalry with France. Many navigation regulations were designed to advantage Britain vis-a-vis France. Smith argues, for example, that the harm to France from prohibiting trade in military stores more than compensates the loss in wealth due to the restrictions. I demonstrate the logic of these claims using tools from modern political economics and political science.

PDF HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abbreviations for Smith's Ouvre
  2. (All references to Adam Smith’s works are to the Glasgow edition (as reprinted by Liberty Fund). Originally published by Oxford: Oxford University Press. The two different published versions have exactly the same text).
  3. Corr: Smith, Adam. (Various) The Correspondence of Adam Smith. Ernest Campbell Mossner and Ian Simpson Ross, eds., vol. VI of the Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  4. LJ(A): Smith, Adam. 1762-63; [1981]. Lectures on Jurisprudence: Report of 1762–3. R. L. Meek., D.D. Raphael, and G. Stein, eds. vol. V of the Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  5. LJ(B): Smith, Adam. (1766)[1981] Lectures on Jurisprudence: Report dated 1766. R. L. Meek., D.D. Raphael, and G. Stein, eds., vol. V of the Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  6. WN: Smith, Adam. 1776 [1976]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 2 vols. R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner, and W.B. Todd, eds. vol II of the Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218
  7. References for Adam Smith British empire
  8. Benians, E. A. 1925. Adam Smith's Project of an Empire. Cambridge Historical Journal 1 (3): 249–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474691300001062
  9. Coase, Ronald. 1977. The Wealth of Nations. Economic Inquiry 15 (3): 309–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1977.tb00478.x
  10. Coats, A.W. 1975. Adam Smith and the Mercantilism, in Andrew S. Skinner and Thomas Wilson, eds., Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  11. Ekelund, Robert B., and Robert D. Tollison. 1981. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society: Economic Regulation in Historical Perspective. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
  12. Ekelund, Robert B., and Robert D. Tollison. 1997. Politicized Economies: Monarchy, Monopoly, and Mercantilism. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
  13. Evensky, Jerry. 2005. Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Markets, Law, Ethics, and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610646
  14. Evensky, Jerry. 2015. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: A Reader’s Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338296
  15. Fay, C. R. 1956. Adam Smith and the Scotland of His Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Fearon, James D. 1995. "Rationalist Explanations for War." International Organization 49 (Summer): 379–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033324
  17. Ferguson, Niall. 2003. Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World. London: Penguin Books.
  18. Findlay, Ronald, and Kevin H. O’Rourke. 2007. Power and Plenty: Tade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831883
  19. Grampp, William D. 1965. Economic Liberalism. Vol. II: The Classical View. New York: Random House.
  20. Hirschman, Albert O. 1945 [1980]. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520378179
  21. Hollander, Samuel. 1973. The Economics of Adam Smith. University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487599584
  22. Holt, J. C. 1992. Magna Carta. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107049956
  23. Hont, Istvan. 1988. “Adam Smith and the Political Economy of the Unnatural and Retrograde Order.” Reprinted in, idem., The Jealousy of Trade 2005. Harvard University Press.
  24. Hont, Istvan. 1989 [2005]) “Adam Smith and the Political Economy of the ‘Unnatural and Retrograde’ Order.” Reprinted in, idem, The Jealousy of Trade 2005. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  25. Hont, Istvan. 2005. “Introduction.” Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Hont, Istvan. 2009. “Adam Smith’s History of Law and Government as Political Theory.” in R. Bourke and R. Geuss (eds), Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605468.006
  27. Hont, Istvan. 2015. Politics in Commercial Society: Jean Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith. Béla Kapossy and Michael Sonenscher, eds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674286177
  28. Hume, David. 1752c.[1985.] “Of the Jealousy of Trade.” ." Essay VI, Part II, in Eugene Miller, ed., Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
  29. Kennedy, Gavin. 2010. Adam Smith. 2nd ed., Houndmill, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230291652
  30. Klein, Benjamin, Robert G. Crawford, and Armen A. Alchian. 1978. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process,” Journal of Law and Economics. 21 (2);m297-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466922
  31. Koebner, Richard. 1961. Empire. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.
  32. Liu, Glory M. 2022. Inventing the Invisible Hand: Adam Smith in American Thought and Politics, 1776 to Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press
  33. Liu, Glory M., and Barry R. Weingast. 2022. “Deriving ‘General Principles’ in Adam Smith: The Ubiquity of Equilibrium and Comparative Statics Analysis throughout His Works.” Adam Smith Review. 12: 134–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003056744-10
  34. Liu, Glory M., and Barry R. Weingast. 2026. “Modern State Capacity in The Wealth of Nations.” History of Political Economy (forthcoming).
  35. Logan, William Bryant. 2005. Oak: The Frame of Civilization. London: W. W. Norton.
  36. Magnusson, Lars G. 2007. "Mercantilism". In Warren J. Samuels, Jeff E. Biddle, Jon B. Davis, eds, A Companion to the History of Economic Thought, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  37. Mitchell, B. T. 1988. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Morrow, James D., Randolph M. Siverson and Tressa Tabares. 1998. "The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907-1990. " American Political Science Review, 92(3): 649–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2585487
  39. Moss, Laurence. 1979. “Power and Value Relationships in the Wealth of Nations” in Gerald O’Driscoll, Jr., ed., Adam Smith and Modern Political Economy: Bicentennial Essays on the Wealth of Nations. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
  40. Muller, Jerry Z. 1993. Adam Smith in His Time and Ours. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  41. North, Douglass C., and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. "Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in 17th Century England." Journal of Economic History 49 (December 1989): 803–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700009451
  42. North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839
  43. Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2020. The Routledge Guidebook to Smith's Wealth of Nations. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824204
  44. Palen, Marc-William, 2014. “Adam Smith As Advocate Of Empire, C. 1870-1932.” The Historical Journal, 57 (1): 179–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X13000101
  45. Phillipson, Nicholas. 2010. Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  46. Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400826636
  47. Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review. 85 (4): 1303–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1963947
  48. Powell, Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691213989
  49. Pownall, Thomas. 1776. A Letter from Governor Pownall to Adam Smith, September 25, 1776. Appendix A, in Corr. 337-76.
  50. Rodriguez Braun, Carlos. 1992. “Pownall on Smith on Colonies.” Storia del Pensiero Economico, 23: 3–10.
  51. Salop, Steven C., and David T. Scheffman, 1983. “Raising Rivals’ Costs: Recent Advances in the Theory of Industrial Structure.” American Economic Review. 73: 267
  52. Schofield, Norman. 1982. “Constitutional Quandaries and Critical Elections.” Philosophy, Politics, and Economics 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X0300200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X03002001422
  53. Skinner, A. S. 1996a. "Mercantilist Policy: The American Colonies" in A. S. Skinner, A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198233343.001.0001
  54. Skinner, Andrew S. 2009. “The Mercantile System.” In Jeffrey T. Young, ed., Elgar Companion to Adam Smith. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  55. Smith, Craig. 2006. Adam Smith’s Political Philosophy: The Invisible Hand and Spontaneous Order. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203008485
  56. Sowell, Thomas. 1979. “Adam Smith in Theory and Practice.” in Gerald O’Driscoll, ed., Adam Smith and Modern Political Economy. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
  57. Stevens, David. 1977. “Smith's Thoughts. On the state of the contest with America, February 1778.” Appendix B in Corr.
  58. Tollison, Robert D. 1982. “Rent Seeking: A Survey.” Kyklos 35 (4): 575–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1982.tb00174.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1982.tb00174.x
  59. Van de Haar, Edwin. 2013. "Adam Smith on Empire and International Relations." in Christopher J. Berry, Maria Pia Paganelli, and Craig Smith, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199605064.013.0021
  60. Viner, Jacob. 1927. “Adam Smith and Laissez Faire.” Journal of Political Economy 35 (2): 198–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/253837
  61. Viner, Jacob. 1948. “Power versus Plenty as Objectives of Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” World Politics. 1: 1–29. Reprinted in his The Long View and the Short. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press 1958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009156
  62. Walton, Gary, and James Shepherd. 1979. The Economic Rise of Early America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  63. Weber, Max. 1905 [2001]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
  64. Weingast, Barry R. 2020. “The Many, Diverse ‘Main Points’ of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qoy8WITSybQxBtjX-dNykfG86BpqEBdmkGJmSmym0tc/edit?tab=t.0.
  65. Weingast, Barry R. 2026. Violence, Liberty, and Development: A Radical Reinterpretation of Adam Smith's Political Science. Book MSS, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
  66. Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
  67. Winch, Donald. 1965. Classical Political Economy and Colonies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  68. Winch, Donald. 1996. Riches and Poverty: An intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750-1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.