Durham & Thunmann
Diamond open access No APC ISSN 2977-0025
Journal menu
Cover of Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law, volume 4, issue 1

The Ethics of Interdependence: Trade, Responsibility and the Limits of Economic Power

This issue examines a recurring paradox of commercial order: the pursuit of autonomy within systems sustained by interdependence, incomplete knowledge and reciprocal restraint. From tariffs and human-rights due diligence to Confucian economic culture and U.S.–China rivalry, five studies trace the limits of economic power and the responsibilities that make exchange possible.

Published
03 September 2026
Articles
2
Access
Open access

Research articles

Search all articles
  1. 01

    Research Article · Pages 1-13

    Economics Against the Human Order

    Yeomin Yoon

    Due to their misunderstanding of the nature of economics, mainstream American economists have become unwitting agents of destruction not only to the US but also to human civilization, largely because of American power and influence. The country often dubbed as “the only superpower” is richer than it has ever been. Its aggregate economy does not suffer from a lack of resources. For many years, mainstream American economists have neglected, and still appear to neglect, ecological and social interdependence by treating all goods equally, without considering the various ways in which the production of such goods depends on the rest of the world. By doing so, American economists have reduced all values to that of private profit-making. Many American economists have employed efficiency, productivity, and profit without a social and ecological context. As a result, they inadvertently look as if they have become antisocial and anti-ecological. This paper contends that such perverted and even contemptible aspects of mainstream American economists provide the counterparts in other countries with a valuable lesson to "learn reversely (or oppositely)" from the superpower. Additionally, it behooves all thinking persons, regardless of nationalities or ethnicities, to ask whether technology is acting like a foreign body in our socio-economic organism. Lastly, not least, what are the criteria for acceptable and unacceptable economic and technological growth toward what kind of goals?

  2. 02

    Research Article · Pages 14-28

    Ethical due Diligence across Borders: Why Contract Clauses are not Enough

    Nicolas Groffman

    This article examines the extent to which contractual mechanisms with overseas distributors, commercial agents and other intermediaries can discharge, or credibly support, human-rights and environmental due-diligence duties in global value chains. Using a doctrinal and normative analysis that brings agency and distribution law into conversation with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and Directive (EU) 2024/1760, it distinguishes the forms of leverage available across subsidiaries, suppliers, distributors, agents and other intermediaries. The article argues that contractual clauses remain indispensable for defining standards, generating information, creating procedural leverage, shaping incentives and structuring remediation, but that their capacity to shift legal responsibility is structurally limited by information asymmetry, enforceability constraints and mandatory law. It therefore rejects a model of ethics clauses as standalone devices for downstream risk transfer. Instead, it proposes an integrated model in which risk-based partner selection, calibrated contractual controls, continuous monitoring, corrective action and responsible exit operate as a continuous governance cycle. The main conclusion is that contract can operationalise due diligence, but cannot substitute for it.