Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law
Articles

India, South Korea, and Vietnam: A Triangle of Confidence in the Making

Taekmin Nam
University of Virginia
Shikhar Dhingra
Columbia University
Loc Ngo
The University of Texas at Austin
JGTEL

Published 2024-12-31

Keywords

  • India,
  • South Korea,
  • Vietnam,
  • Trilateral,
  • Cooperation

How to Cite

India, South Korea, and Vietnam: A Triangle of Confidence in the Making. (2024). Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law, 2(2), 50-72. https://doi.org/10.70150/13cg7150

Abstract

The world today is being pushed closer to a multipolar order by major events in recent times. In facing the ramification of such disruption, many countries have been left with their economies in shambles. Despite the odds, India, South Korea, and Vietnam are the three countries in Asia that have continued to show solid growth throughout the pandemic. Beyond the common economic resilience seen in the present time, the three countries also share mutual defense concerns that trace back to their histories of anti-colonialism. In this paper, we analyze shared features between the three countries that are grounded on the basis of historical anti-colonial struggles, as well as present national security and economic concerns, altogether providing backdrop for a promising three-way alliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Achcar, Gilbert. 2023. The New Cold War: The United States, Russia, and China from Kosovo to Ukraine. Haymarket Books.
  2. Alessio, Dominic, and William Renfro. 2022. "Building Empires Litorally in the South China Sea: Artificial Islands and Contesting Definitions of Imperialism." International Politics 59 (4): 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00328-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00328-x
  3. Asselin, Pierre. 2007. "Choosing Peace: Hanoi and the Geneva Agreement on Vietnam, 1954–1955." Journal of Cold War Studies 9 (2): 95–126. https://doi.org/10.1162/jcws.2007.9.2.95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jcws.2007.9.2.95
  4. Bernard, Andrew B., Stephen J. Redding, and Peter K. Schott. 2007. "Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms." Review of Economic Studies 74 (1): 31–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00413.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00413.x
  5. Biswas, Bidisha. 2023. "‘You Can’t Go to War Over Refugees’: The Bangladesh War of 1971 and the International Refugee Regime." Refugee Survey Quarterly 42 (1): 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac026
  6. Bose, Sugata. 1990. "Starvation amidst Plenty: The Making of Famine in Bengal, Honan and Tonkin, 1942–45." Modern Asian Studies 24 (4): 699–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00010556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00010556
  7. Bowen, H. V. 2005. The Business of Empire: The East India Company and Imperial Britain, 1756–1833. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495724
  8. Cabral, Ricardo, and André V. Mollick. 2012. "Mexico’s Regional Output Convergence After NAFTA: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis." The Annals of Regional Science 48 (3): 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0425-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0425-1
  9. Cafruny, Alan, Vassilis K. Fouskas, William D. E. Mallinson, and Andrei Voynitsky. 2023. "Ukraine, Multipolarity and the Crisis of Grand Strategies." Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 25 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2022.2084881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2022.2084881
  10. Disney, A. R. 1977. "The First Portuguese India Company, 1628–33." The Economic History Review 30 (2): 242. https://doi.org/10.2307/2595145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2595145
  11. Fajgelbaum, Pablo D., and Amit K. Khandelwal. 2016. "Measuring the Unequal Gains from Trade." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (3): 1113–1180. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw013
  12. Fisher, Michael H. 1985. "The Imperial Coronation of 1819: Awadh, the British and the Mughals." Modern Asian Studies 19 (2): 239–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00012324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00012324
  13. Frankel, Jeffrey A., and David Romer. 1999. "Does Trade Cause Growth?" American Economic Review 89 (3): 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379
  14. Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 1991. "Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth." European Economic Review 35 (2–3): 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A
  15. Herring, George C. 2004. "The Cold War and Vietnam." OAH Magazine of History 18 (5): 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/maghis/18.5.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/maghis/18.5.18
  16. IMF. 2022. War Sets Back the Global Recovery. International Monetary Fund.
  17. Ji-hye, Shin. 2022. "Korean, Vietnamese Leaders Agree to Upgrade Bilateral Relations." The Korea Herald, June 8, 2022. https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20220608000819.
  18. Johnston, Lauren A. 2019. "The Belt and Road Initiative: What Is in It for China?" Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 6 (1): 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.265
  19. Kang, David C., Duc X. Nguyen, Ruike T. Fu, and Megan Shaw. 2019. "War, Rebellion, and Intervention under Hierarchy: Vietnam–China Relations, 1365 to 1841." Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (4): 896–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718772345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718772345
  20. Karackattu, Joe Thomas. 2018. "India–China Border Dispute: Boundary-Making and Shaping of Material Realities from the Mid-Nineteenth to Mid-Twentieth Century." Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 28 (1): 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186317000281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186317000281
  21. Karlsson, Sune, Nannan Lundin, Fredrik Sjöholm, and Ping He. 2009. "Foreign Firms and Chinese Employment." World Economy 32 (1): 178–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01162.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01162.x
  22. Kim, Dong-Woon, and Ki-Joo Park. 2008. "Colonialism and Industrialisation: Factory Labour Productivity of Colonial Korea, 1913–37." Australian Economic History Review 48 (1): 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8446.2007.00226.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8446.2007.00226.x
  23. Kim, Mi-Sung-Hyun. 2022. "Colonial Compensation and the Judicial Process: South Korea–Japan Disputes Revisited." The American Journal of Comparative Law 70 (4): 736–779. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avad010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avad010
  24. Kim, Young-Gyu. 2008. "Two Perspectives on the 1895 Assassination of Queen Min." Korea Journal 48 (2): 160–185. https://doi.org/10.25024/KJ.2008.48.2.160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2008.48.2.160
  25. Krugman, Paul. 1979. "Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade." Journal of International Economics 9 (4): 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5
  26. Kutlina-Dimitrova, Zornitsa. 2017. "The Economic Impact of the Russian Import Ban: A CGE Analysis." International Economics and Economic Policy 14 (4): 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0376-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0376-4
  27. Kwark, Nahn-Soo, and Hyun Lim. 2020. "Have the Free Trade Agreements Reduced Inflation Rates?" Economics Letters 189: 109054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109054
  28. Maggi, Giovanni, and Ralph Ossa. 2021. "The Political Economy of Deep Integration." Annual Review of Economics 13 (1): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-121020-032425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-121020-032425
  29. Malik, Mohan. 2018. "China and India: Maritime Maneuvers and Geopolitical Shifts in the Indo-Pacific." Rising Power Quarterly 3 (2): 67–81. https://risingpowersproject.com/china-and-india-maritime-maneuvers-and-geopolitical-shifts-in-the-indo-pacific/.
  30. Martuscelli, Anna, and Monica Gasiorek. 2019. "Regional Integration and Poverty: A Review of the Transmission Channels and the Evidence." Journal of Economic Surveys 33 (2): 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12283
  31. Matray, James I. 1981. "Captive of the Cold War: The Decision to Divide Korea at the 38th Parallel." Pacific Historical Review 50 (2): 145–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/3638724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3638724
  32. Mazumdar, Arijit. 2021. "From ‘Look East’ to ‘Act East’: India’s Evolving Engagement with the Asia-Pacific Region." Asian Affairs 52 (2): 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2021.1912467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2021.1912467
  33. Medvedev, Denis. 2012. "Beyond Trade: The Impact of Preferential Trade Agreements on FDI Inflows." World Development 40 (1): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.036
  34. Ministry of External Affairs of India. 2020. "Peace, Prosperity and People- The India Vietnam Summit 2020." December 21, 2020. https://indbiz.gov.in/peace-prosperity-and-people-the-india-vietnam-summit-2020/.
  35. Murray, Martin J. 1980. The Development of Capitalism in Colonial Indochina (1870–1940). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  36. Negi, Manjeet. 2022. "Indian Army to Deploy K-9 Howitzers in Central, Eastern Sectors of LAC with China." India Today, February 4, 2022. https://www.indiatoday.in/defence/story/indian-army-to-deploy-k9-howitzers-central-eastern-sectors-lac-china-1908902-2022-02-04.
  37. Presidential Executive Office of Russia. 2022. "St Petersburg International Economic Forum Plenary Session." June 17, 2022. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/68669.
  38. Santos-Paulino, Amelia U., Alessandra DiCaprio, and Marina V. Sokolova. 2019. "The Development Trinity: How Regional Integration Impacts Growth, Inequality and Poverty." The World Economy 42 (7): 1961–1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12788
  39. Sidky, Mohammed H. 1976. "Chinese World Strategy and South Asia: The China Factor in Indo-Pakistani Relations." Asian Survey 16 (10): 965–980. https://doi.org/10.2307/2643536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2643536
  40. Sjöholm, Fredrik, and Robert E. Lipsey. 2006. "Foreign Firms and Indonesian Manufacturing Wages: An Analysis with Panel Data." Economic Development and Cultural Change 55 (1): 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1086/505723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/505723
  41. Smitka, Michael, ed. 1998. Japanese Prewar Growth: Lessons for Development Theory? New York: Garland Publishing.
  42. Solanki, Vishal. 2021. "India–Vietnam Defence and Security Cooperation." India Quarterly 77 (2): 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284211004982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284211004982
  43. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. 2014. "Action Plan on the Belt and Road Initiative." September 25, 2014. http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/publications/2015/03/30/content_281475080249035.htm.
  44. Stellman, Jeanne M., and Steven D. Stellman. 2018. "Agent Orange During the Vietnam War: The Lingering Issue of Its Civilian and Military Health Impact." American Journal of Public Health 108 (6): 726–728. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304426
  45. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2017. "The Overselling of Globalization." Business Economics 52 (3): 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-017-0047-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-017-0047-z
  46. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 2022. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex.
  47. Takii, Kazuhiro. 2023. "The Meiji Restoration as a Constitutional Revolution." In Modern Japan’s Place in World History, edited by Masayuki Yamauchi and Yuichi Hosoya, 1–11. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9593-4_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9593-4_1
  48. Torikata, Yoko. 2007. "Reexamining de Gaulle’s Peace Initiative on the Vietnam War." Diplomatic History 31 (5): 909–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2007.00659.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2007.00659.x
  49. UN News. 2022. "Humanity’s Just One Misunderstanding Away from ‘Nuclear Annihilation,’ Warns UN Chief." August 1, 2022. https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/08/1123752.
  50. Vaddi, Suman. 2023. "Reconciliation and Peace Process in Inter-Korean Relations." Peace Review 35 (1): 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2022.2155036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2022.2155036
  51. Wang, Jian, and Chan-Hyun Choi. 2019. "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Asia: Comparative Analysis of China, India, Vietnam and Korea." Korea Trade Review 44 (3): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.22659/KTRA.2019.44.3.15.
  52. Watt, Alan. 1967. "The Geneva Agreements 1954 in Relation to Vietnam." The Australian Quarterly 39 (2): 7. https://doi.org/10.2307/20634125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20634125
  53. Wilson, Nicholas H. 2023. Modernity’s Corruption: Empire and Morality in the Making of British India. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/wils19218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/wils19218
  54. Wouters, Jelle J. P. 2023. "Neoliberal Capitalism and Ethno-Territoriality in Highland Northeast India: Resource-Extraction, Capitalist Desires and Ethnic Closure." Geopolitics 28 (1): 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1812581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1812581
  55. Yoshimi, Yoshiaki. 2002. Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military During World War II. New York: Columbia University Press.